google and intercourse

If you do a search for intercourse on Google, you'll find my verbal intercourse section as result number 111. That's not a high ranking. In fact, it's surrounded by several references talking about painful intercourse. Not exactly what you expect to be a high traffic area. And yet, people consistantly not only make that search and are that far down in the results, but click on my site. How can this be? Why? What do they hope to find down here?

Intershop

I'm working on a contract that involves a little scripting for Intershop's e-commerce software, and all I have to say is that it's the only product I've ever seen to use more tables than I do. I'm realize they've got people with a whole lot more knowledge on the subject working on this type of stuff, but why does everything have to be so convoluted?

new in verbal

Two more things I've written and just neglected to put online are now in verbal intercourse. The first, Snow Crash vs. Brave New World is a research paper I did this spring. Charlemagne: Characteristics of a Leader is a paper I wrote a couple weeks ago for Medieval Civilizations.

new writing in thoughts

A lot has gone on over the past few months that I've been here in California. I went through a lot of ups and downs, and as usual that led me to write. I've made a good portion of what I wrote during that time available in thoughts under the section Fall 2001: on breakups and renewal.

slight fix

So I just fixed it so title links only show up in posts that have bodies. I realize before it was impossible to figure out if a post had a body without clicking on it. This fixes that.